Accessibility Tools

Follow Palmers Green Community on Facebook Follow Palmers Green Community on Twitter Follow Palmers Green Community on Bluesky

Forum topic: Dogged Whitewebbs campaigners raising money for new legal challenge

Dogged Whitewebbs campaigners raising money for new legal challenge

13 Aug 2025 20:43 #7424
  • PGC Webmaster

Share share on facebook icon share on twitter icon bluesky icon Email

[Original article]

Undeterred by multiple setbacks to their fight to stop an international sports giant taking over a large expanse of a nature-rich parkland in north Enfield, a campaign group has launched a crowdfunder to cover the costs of a new legal challenge.

 Demonstrators in Whitewebbs Park dressed for cold weather and holding a large Save Whitewebbs bannerSupporters of the Save Whitewebbs campaign brave cold weather at a demonstration in February this year

The Guardians of Whitewebbs campaign has joined forces with the Public Interest Law Centre to launch a new judicial review of Enfield Council's decision to grant planning permission for a large part of the former Whitewebbs golf course to be covered by pitches for a women's football training centre for Tottenham Hotspur football club.

The council's decision followed a long period of determined campaigning by Friends of Whitewebbs Park and Guardians of Whitewebbs, culminating earlier this year in an unsuccessful appeal to the mayor of London to block planning permission. This was finally granted in July.

The new judicial review will challenge the grant of planning permission. An earlier, unsuccessful, judicial review requested by Sean Wilkinson of the Friends of Whitewebbs Park related to another point of law and, the campaigners say, is not relevant to the planned new appeal.

In April this year Mitchells & Butlers, the owners of the Toby Carvery pub inside Whitewebbs Park, subjected an ancient oak to drastic tree surgery, prompting Guardians of Whitewebbs to stage a demo in protest, as recorded in this video. Mitchells & Butlers are linked financially to the company that owns Tottenham Hotspur FC.

The initial sum required for the launch of the judicial review is £20,000. As of 13th August 224 supporters had pledged money amounting to £10,908, with a further 22 days remaining to obtain pledges for the remainder.

The 240-acre park, comprising grassland and ancient woodland, was bought by Middlesex County Council in 1931 for the public. It is Green Belt land held in public trust on a lease term of 999 years. The park’s grassland section was used from the 1930s until 2021 as a public golf course. The former golf course has since rewilded itself.

 The Tottenham Hotspur men's training centre in Whitewebbs Lane was opened 17 years ago. It too is located in the Green Belt, adjacent to, but not visible from, Whitewebbs.

Guardians of Whitewebbs argue that Tottenham Hotspur have no need of a separate training facility for women players and that the amount they will be paying to lease Whitewebbs for 25 years (in total, £2 million) is a trifling amount for such a wealthy football club:

"We support women’s football, but Spurs already have the pitches they need. They won’t allow women to use their existing seventeen elite pitches (constructed on Enfield’s Green Belt seventeen years ago). Only Manchester City has as many pitches as Spurs and they don’t exclude women. So this new facility is completely unnecessary. It’s just an excuse to take more public land. Spurs will rent the land for £2m over 25 years (£80k pa). The club has an annual turnover of over £0.5 billion and spends more than £2m on players’ wages every week!"

The campaigners cast doubt on the likelihood of the club delivering on the promises which it has made in relation to the future of other parts of Whitewebbs, citing their failure to carry out earlier promises:

"When Spurs built their men’s training facility, it promised an on-site education centre for Enfield children and a nature reserve, both private. It said every child would be able to visit these three times in their school career. Now seventeen years later, many children, like Sam Gracie Tillbrook of the Guardians of Whitewebbs campaign, have turned 18, and nothing has been built yet. In fact Spurs diverted that land for use as a 'temporary' football pitch for the women’s team - the original site for the promised nature reserve! This women’s pitch includes a 500-seater spectator stand. The education centre hasn’t been built and the nature reserve, now pushed further along the Green Belt to Dickinson’s Meadow, has only recently been started. As of July 2025, the work on this nature reserve has mainly involved clearing the young woodland, digging a channel to divert the stream and replacing some fence posts. This video created by Sam, “Whitewebbs Park - What Tottenham Hotspur and Enfield Council Don’t Want You to Know”, addresses the misleading claims made by Tottenham Hotspur Football Club and Enfield Council about their proposals to develop Whitewebbs Park."

Donate to the fundraiser

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Green belt, valuable habitat, trees vs corporate. This is Whitewebbs

14 Aug 2025 00:37 - 14 Aug 2025 00:41 #7425
  • Karl Brown

Share share on facebook icon share on twitter icon bluesky icon Email

One tree, two men, 4 years and three months in prison. That was Sycamore Gap. The vastly more environmentally valuable Whitewebbs Oak? Spurs new training pitch extension – two hundred and seven trees, included veterans? Does anyone care.

We’re facing the loss of green belt space equivalent to 20 football pitches, bulldozed and concreted over to prepare 10 new training pitches to add to the 17 Spurs have already next door. That’s more than any other English club, all of whom seem to manage sharing between men, women, and I guess every shade of LGBQT+.

But not in Enfield.

And compensation for this forever loss of public parkland? The equivalent of £80,000 per year. Top earners at Spurs get paid more than TWO HUNDRED times that sum. So, in this age of “The Deal”, it seems Enfield were asleep at the desk and we, ratepayers, end up losing priceless public parkland for a pittance. It will be walled off and irreversibly killed as valuable habitat during the term of a lease. Spurs had other options, so did Enfield.

Desperately, desperately bad and an election vote determinant issue at every election level in this household.

There's a final chance, a judicial review challenging Enfield’s planning permission. You can support it. Someone has to care.

www.crowdjustice.com/case/savewhitewebbs/
Last edit: 14 Aug 2025 00:41 by PGC Webmaster.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Dogged Whitewebbs campaigners raising money for new legal challenge

14 Aug 2025 06:44 #7426
  • Darren Edgar

Share share on facebook icon share on twitter icon bluesky icon Email

Utterly shameless and disgraceful further waste of tax payers after TWICE losing at previous attempts and costing us all 10s of 1000s of pounds.

This should not be allowed without the complainants first departing funds in advance of an adverse costs award.

And sycamore gap has absolutely NOTHING to do with it. Classic emotive attempt to compensate for a lack of actual argument.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Dogged Whitewebbs campaigners raising money for new legal challenge

14 Aug 2025 06:47 #7427
  • Darren Edgar

Share share on facebook icon share on twitter icon bluesky icon Email

The irony too of a "what Spurs don't want you to know" video that addresses nothing and provides no novel points to address "misleading claims" when the antis whole campaign has been about misinformation misrepresentation and outright lies (which is why they keep losing).

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Dogged Whitewebbs campaigners raising money for new legal challenge

27 Aug 2025 00:19 - 27 Aug 2025 01:02 #7434
  • PGC Webmaster

Share share on facebook icon share on twitter icon bluesky icon Email

Supporters of the campaign to stop the takeover of a large part of Whitewebbs Park by Tottenham Hotspur are celebrating their success in receiving pledges in excess of the £20,000 required to set their legal challenge in motion.

They outline next steps in an update on the crowdfunder page :

By way of a brief update, this £20,000 is the minimum we need to proceed, but we encourage you to  donate  to the stretch target of £30,000 to cover full legal costs.

We have already sent a letter before claim (also known as a letter before action) and we expect Enfield Council to respond to this soon. We will consider its response; then, unless it concedes, we will urgently issue the grounds to the court at the beginning of September. Subsequently, we hope the court will grant us permission to proceed with the case, and we will continue to a full hearing.

Given that most of the legal case must remain confidential, we are unable to share more detailed information until after we issue the grounds to the court (and potentially not until we hear from the judge regarding whether we can proceed). Please note we are working extremely hard in the background with our expert legal team, solicitor Harriet Child (Public Interest Law Centre), and barrister Alex Shattock (Landmark AChambers). We will keep you all informed as we progress with the case.

A further success for the campaigners was a detailed report in the London-wide Metro newspaper under the headline "The ‘David and Goliath battle’ to stop Spurs building 11 pitches on a London park".



Last edit: 27 Aug 2025 01:02 by PGC Webmaster.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: PGC WebmasterBasil Clarke
Time to create page: 0.668 seconds
Powered by PGC Forums

Find us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on Bluesky

Clicky