pgc all green working and signpost with lettering new colour 2
pgc all green working and signpost with lettering new colour 2
Follow Palmers Green Community on Facebook Follow Palmers Green Community on Twitter Follow Palmers Green Community on Bluesky

News

Share this article share on facebook Share on Bluesky share on twitter

The leader of the Conservative group on Enfield Council has stated that if he becomes council leader every low-traffic neighbourhood in the borough will be 'ripped out'.

Cllr Alessandro Georgiou made the promise to remove low-traffic neighbourhoods in Enfield in a video which was posted to his X account on 2nd June. The video shows him standing near the railway bridge in Fox Lane and saying:

"I'm here outside one of Enfield Labour's low-traffic neighbourhoods, and if I become leader of the council next year, every single low traffic neighbourhood in Enfield will be ripped out. The cameras will be turned off on day 1."

The Tory group leader is quoted making a similar statement in an article published in the June 2025 issue of Enfield Dispatch, adding, "I’d go and take them out myself".

Low-traffic neighbourhoods in Enfield

There are only two new-style low-traffic neighbourhoods in the borough: the Fox Lane Quieter Neighbourhood, which stretches between Palmers Green and Southgate Green, and the Bowes Primary Quieter Neighbourhood, located west of Green Lanes and south of the North Circular Road (this actually consists of two LTNs with Brownlow Road, where there are no traffic restrictions, running between them).

The Bowes scheme was brought into operation in 2020 and its implementation was funded by the then Conservative government. The Fox Lane LTN followed later in the same year.

However, the concept of designing neighbourhoods in such a way that drivers cannot cut through them dates back much further than the 2020s and has been completely standard practice since the 1950s, after it became evident that car ownership and use was rising quickly. The map below shows all the areas in the borough that it is impossible to cut through by car or pointless to try to do so.

ltns in enfield 700pxPre- and post-2020 "LTNs" in Enfield (adapted from the London Boroughs Healthy Streets Scorecard's London Bus Priority Map 2022 - click on the map for a larger version)

 

Log in to comment
Karl Brown posted a reply
05 Jun 2025 11:04
Such a shame the photo didn’t catch the Fox Lane bridge vegetable peel dumper in action. That would have formed a constructive intervention.
RIchard Crutchley posted a reply
05 Jun 2025 20:48
I've had Tory leaflets through the letter box that say much the same thing. I don't agree with the idea, because it's on the wrong side of history, but I despise even more the lack of any reasoning, evidence or facts stated for wanting to do this, any consideration of the impacts and consequences, the cost, public opinion or what he / they might do to aspire towards the sort of benefits that LTNs do. It's just moronic, stupid politics. Grow up.
Karl Brown posted a reply
08 Jun 2025 16:44
I found myself reflecting on Richard Crutchley’s post when reading two articles from different ends of the political press this weekend. First was Norman Foster, (they indicate “the”) world leading architect, in a major Daily Telegraph interview. He argues for the green belt’s extension, not from a typical environmental base, but rather to avoid urban sprawl, so generating compact cities, which help erode loneliness (neighbourhoods), a known killer, and which encourage walking rather than driving, which is healthier and so you live longer. I imagine an architect of such pedigree knows his planning arguments. The second was a Guardian Journal article by Professor Devi Sridhar, chair of Public Health at Edinburgh University, a face frequently on TV during Covid. Addressing the UK’s now (shocking) declining life expectancy she outlined personal efforts to lengthen her own – exercising, eating healthy, nothing surprising – but argues this is secondary to a societal approach to health, something which is our collective responsibility and something politicians should be prioritising. From a very short list, which also included nutritious food, safe water and preventative health provision, she homed in on clean air policies and active cities – ie legs not cars.  Opposite spectrum political press, two very different specialisms, two world class proponents, same conclusion.  The hard data and resulting elected London Mayoral policy conclusions have pointed the same way across all political persuasions.
JuliusCaf posted a reply
12 Jun 2025 05:49
A typical Tory.
Oppose for the sake of opposing, regardless of the benefits.
0

Find us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on Bluesky

Clicky