Accessibility Tools

Follow Palmers Green Community on Facebook Follow Palmers Green Community on Twitter Follow Palmers Green Community on Bluesky

Comment

Share this article share on facebook Share on Bluesky share on twitter

Enfield Council's new minority Conservative administration has begun the process required to remove the Fox Lane and Bowes low-traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs), despite the fact that their share of votes did not give them a mandate to do so.

If the minority Conservative administration gets its way, Fox Lane and all the streets on either side will again be dominated by cars rather than people

In his May/June 2026 newsletter to residents of Southgate ward, Cllr Stephanos Ioannou writes that all Conservative councillors in the borough “are committed to ensuring that we fulfil a main manifesto pledge to remove all existing LTNs and to abolish all future planned LTNs in the borough”. He goes on to write that “we are currently setting out a timeline for their removal. We will remove them.”

In the newsletter Cllr Ioannou also claims that LTNs have “negatively impacted the lives of all residents” and that they “worsen living standards” by increasing journey times.;

In a social media interaction with a supporter of LTNs who asks “Stephanos, How much council money have you set aside to spend on court cases & fees regarding LTN removals?”, the councillor replies, “Paul, LTNs will be removed at all costs. Worth every penny removing them, people hate them. As do I.”

It's correct that this pledge was included in the Conservative manifesto. However, the Tories did not win a majority of seats and only won a third (33.3%) of votes cast. The two other parties who won seats - Labour and the Greens - both supported retaining the LTNs, and between them they won 45.8% of the votes cast and more seats on the council than the Conservatives. The Tories thus cannot claim to have a mandate to abolish the LTNs.

Furthermore, the LTNs have not negatively impacted the lives of all residents. Many if not most people living within the LTNs will have been positively impacted because they now live in a safer environment where they can be much more relaxed when walking in local streets. And many people living outside the LTNs benefit too: they are able to walk or cycle through the LTNs without the danger and stress brought on by large numbers of fast moving cars. I myself benefit. I walk through the Fox Lane LTN several times a week and my health benefits from walking up hilly Fox Lane to get to addresses in Southgate. Previously, I often caught the bus instead because the large amount of traffic in Fox Lane was intimidating, noisy and stressful.

Eighty or ninety per cent of those drivers had no business driving through those residential roads, and because they didn't live there, they paid little attention to the disruption they were causing to residents and pedestrians..And as for Cllr Ioannou's point that “Roads must be accessible for all regardless”: regardless of what he writes, there are no parts of any roads that can't be accessed by drivers. And with regard to accessibility, every day I see two disabled men using zimmer frames walking down Fox Lane in the middle of the road on their way to the shops. They now have a truly acccessible way to get to Green Lanes, previously having to use the pavements would have made those journeys much more challenging.

As for worsening living standards, well my standard of living and overall wellbeing have been greatly improved, and no doubt that's true for hundreds of others. I don't measure my wellbeing in terms of how long it takes me to get from A to B, I measure in terms of how much birdsong I can hear as i walk along, and how much pleasure I get from walking, and I compare it to the dreadful car-infested past, where it was pointless stopping to talk to someone because we were drowned out by traffic noise.. I can take pleasure in seeing other people, including many children, walking the calm streets or making the steep ascent of Fox  Lane on their bikes..

“People hate them”. Clearly, some do, but many love them. I can't wait for the whole borough and the whole country to be full of them. Walk the calm streets of Walthamstow and see what I mean.

The statements

The quotations above are based on screenshots that were provided to me of a discussion thread on NextDoor that took place on 2nd June. The first post in the thread is a selection of extracts from Cllr Ioannou's May/June newsletter (posted by another named person). This is the post that relates to LTNs.

Low Traffic Neighbourhood Schemes (LTNs) All Conservative Councillors in the borough are committed to ensuring that we fulfil a main manifesto pledge to remove all existing LTNs and to abolish all future planned LTNs in the borough. My commitment on this has remained consistent. I have made my feelings clear that I would not have stood as a Councillor ever again if this was not a major commitment, so I am happy to confirm this is still my intentions. LTNs have negatively impacted the lives of all residents by causing more congestion, and more importantly worsening living standards in our borough by increasing journey times. Roads must be accessible for all regardless. I have already had meetings with Journeys and Places, Highways, and also spoken to the Chief Executive about our intentions and we are currently setting out a timeline for their removal. We will remove them.


The full content of the exchange between Cllr Ioannou and Paul is shown below.

Paul writes: Stephanos, how much money have you set aside to spend on court cases & fees regarding LTN removal?

Stephanos Ioannou writes: Paul, LTNs will be removed at all costs. Worth every penny removing them. People hate them. As do I.

Paul writes: Stephanos, How will you recoup the seemingly infinite council funds that you have pledged to remove LTNs due to your hatred of them?

Log in to comment
JuliusCaf posted a reply
04 Jun 2026 05:15
Disgraceful comments from the leader of the council'
He ought to be removed, as he is obviously unfit for the responsible position that he holds!
Steven Murdoch posted a reply
04 Jun 2026 08:06
A view from outside the LTN

It's genuinely good to hear that residents within the Fox Lane LTN are enjoying quieter, safer streets — that's a real benefit and shouldn't be dismissed. But a fuller picture might also take in what's happening just outside.

Green Lanes in Bowes, heading north from Wood Green, has seen a significant increase in stationary traffic since the schemes were introduced. The pedestrians and residents along that corridor are breathing that air and living in a starkly different environment to those inside the LTN. Their health matters too. Local planning that works for everyone needs to weigh those trade-offs honestly — the gains for some against the costs for others.

That's not an argument against LTNs in principle; it's an argument for designing them with the whole community in mind, not just the streets lucky enough to fall within the boundary.
RIchard Crutchley posted a reply
05 Jun 2026 12:47
Agree with this article. I don't think the Tories have a mandate to do this, nor do I think that the LTNs are not wanted by a proportion of residents. They have brought benefits and whilst they also have problems (such as focusing traffic on main routes and potentially increasing congestion and decreasing living environments), I think they're a step in the right direction - and not to mention the massive costs that removing them would entail, not just through the actual physical act of removal, but through the required processes, planning and legal in particular.
Karl Brown posted a reply
07 Jun 2026 14:47
The only stated rationale seems to be to “get Enfield moving” (again). I recall widespread angst about levels of congestion pre LTN’s, so I think we can rule out this intended action as a solution to that particular matter. Conversely, it is traffic speed on Green Lanes (PG high street section) and Aldermans Hill which has been the reported issue from residents and traders over the last two years. A circle to square for the council before jumping in with both feet?    
Basil Clarke posted a reply
10 Jun 2026 15:09


A news report on the Enfield Dispatch website confirms what I published here last week, that the new administration at Enfield Council will be “getting on” with delivering a Conservative election promise to remove the Fox Lane and Bowes low-traffic neighbourhoods.

The report quotes council leader Alessandro Georgiou as saying “we’re getting on with the job they elected us to do.”

However, residents failed to give the Tories sufficient votes to have a majority of councillors. Nor did Conservative candidates garner anything close to a majority of total votes cast. So they do not have a mandate. Their votes were outnumbered by vote cast for the two parties that support retaining the LTNs, Labour and the Greens.

On another of the main issues that residents (in the west of the borough anyway*) care about is the planned new town stretching south from Crews Hill, and the Spurs training ground planned for Whitewebbs. In that case it's fair to say that there is a mandate to cancel both because both Conservatives and Greens opposed them and the two parties together garnered a clear majority of votes. Whe it comes to abolishing LTNs, however, the voting arithmetic is exactly the opposite: Labour plus Greens got a clear majority of votes between them.

*I suspect that residents of the east of borough are less concerned about either issue and many are more worried about just surviving from one day to the next given low pay and high rents.

Read the Enfield Dispatch report
0

Find us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on Bluesky

Clicky