Accessibility Tools

Follow Palmers Green Community on Facebook Follow Palmers Green Community on Twitter Follow Palmers Green Community on Bluesky

Comment

Share this article share on facebook Share on Bluesky share on twitter

Consultation response deadline changed back to 21st September

Enfield Council have changed the deadline for responding to the consultation back to the original date: 21st September.

Enfield residents have an opportunity to help reduce deaths and injuries on the borough's roads by expressing their support for the council's proposals for many more roads to have 20mph speed limits. The evidence from 20mph schemes in many other parts of London and throughout Wales is completely clear: lower speed limits save lives and cut serious injuries.

 Some statistics published in the flyer that went through people's letterboxes last month. If you didn't get one, you can download it from the council website.

A few weeks back leaflets were posted through letterboxes throughout the borough with information about Enfield Council's proposals to introduce 20mph speed limits on a much wider basis than at present: in essence, on most side streets and on main roads where they pass through important town centres.

It's certainly high time that Enfield caught up with the many London boroughs that have introduced widespread 20mph limits - after all, in the league table recently published by Healthy Streets Scorecard, we're very near the bottom when it comes to the casualty rate for pedestrians: 28th out of the 32 boroughs.

Quite apart from the human misery that deaths and serious injuries cause, there's a strong economic case for bringing in measures that will reduce the frequency and severity of crashes: the huge amount of money and of police and health service time that is spent dealing the consequences.

 The benefits of 20mph - summary of evidence (click here to read a text version)

The graphic above summarises the benefits that have been measured in parts of London where 30mph limits have been reduced to 20mph. The likelihood of crashes is greatly reduced because drivers have more time to react to danger, and if a pedestrian is hit by a car doing 20 rather than 30, they are five times more likely to survive. The arguments that lower speeds mean more congestion and more pollution have been disproved, and as for people who claim that they "can't drive" below 21mph, why do we even let them get behind the wheel of a car in the first place? Plus, the pleasanter and safer street environment encourages more walking, wheeling and cycling, all of them beneficial for both physical and mental health.

In addition to the London data, there has been a striking reduction in deaths and injuries as the result of a countrywide move from 30 to 20 in Wales, as described in this article. The author points out that even though a lot of drivers in Wales don't stick strictly to the new 20mph limit, they are now driving slower than they used to and those few miles an hour less are paying dividends - in human lives:

The reduction of 4.2mph from 29mph in July 2023 to 25mph in July this year would be expected to reduce casualties on these roads by 25.2%. The actual reduction was even better at 26.2%.

Source: The Will Hayward Newsletter: Turns out the 20mph limit was great idea!

The council's move has been greeted warmly by Better Streets for Enfield campaigners, though they are critical of the omission of some shopping areas on main roads - for instance, while the council is proposing 20mph for Green Lanes through Palmers Green, they plan to keep 30mph for the whole of Green Lanes as it runs through Winchmore Hill.

Personally, I would like to see 20mph on all roads that have buses running along them, apart from the A406 and A10. The reason: either on their outward journey or on their way back home, bus passengers have to cross the road, and they are much safer if the traffic is travelling at 20mph rather than 30mph - and this applies even when there is a handy zebra crossing.

So, if you value human lives, cleaner air and quieter streets more than the possibility of arriving at the next traffic light a quarter of a minute earlier, then use this consultation to tell the council!

Tell the council what you think about the proposals

 To find out more, visit letstalk.enfield.gov.uk/​20mph or scan the QR code (paper copies are available at libraries and Enfield Civic Centre).

You have until Sunday 21st September to let the council have your views.

Each household should have received one copy of the brochure with the proposals, but that doesn't mean that the council only wants one reply per household - everyone is entitled to have their separate say. If you're using the online survey to submit your views, each person will need to set up their own account with Let's Talk Enfield.

Log in to comment
Neil Littman posted a reply
07 Aug 2025 08:37
I have replied to the survey but just wanted to add a couple of comments here because I think the full picture of road accidents across the borough is more complex than the Summary of Evidence shows. I have no issue with 20mph in built up areas, near schools or many residential side streets and I live in one which was designated 20mph over ten years ago but it hasn't been any deterrent to speeding. I have had cars go past my home at up to 50mph and it's only been sheer luck no accidents have happened so far but looking at the stats over the past few years the two roads with the most accidents are the North Circular A406 and the A10 and at least half the pedestrian (am not counting car crashes which actually involve more fatalities than pedestrians overall in the UK) fatalities happened there. Two people who were jaywalking on the three lane section of the A406 and on the A10 two pedestrians killed by speeding drivers with no regard for safety. Even the average speed cameras now in place would not prevent that happening again but at least it is a deterrent. I have also seen pedestrians trying to cross the A10 at sections with no crossings. It would also be useful to know how a borough-wide 20mph scheme could possibly be monitored?
JuliusCaf posted a reply
08 Aug 2025 11:12
Rubbish!
The 30 mph is broken every day on Bush Hill, Bush Hill Road and London Road, plus many others I bet!
Yiannis Chronakis posted a reply
09 Aug 2025 13:45
I was living in the borders Hackney and Islington through the rollout of 20 mph, from 2006 to 2022. The first phases were only on residential streets, what Enfield is planing now, and gradually it covered the entirety of the boroughs. It felt as a shock initially (what a stupid idea to move at 20 in a car?!) but gradually the streets calmed down, noise levels dropped, walking felt safer, high streets got more lively and nobody got any measurable delays. I started appreciating driving at a constant speed instead of racing from light to light and queue to queue. I cannot imagine nowadays driving anywhere near residential or high streets more than 20 and it's been a few times that close calls stayed as close calls and not incidents.

The main concern moved from doubting the speed limit to complaining about enforcement. And there is almost no enforcement yet the speeds dropped significantly. Maybe not at 20 but at 25 but before that speeds were 30 to 40. This will not tackle the racing and antisocial driving culture that is rampant in Enfield.

I still drive with 20 in Enfield in all roads but those at the borders of the borough and of course dual carriageways and it feels much easier. In terms of time, it makes next to zero difference. Maybe with 30mph you will gain about 30 seconds from Palmers green to Enfield town but it does not worth it. Since I moved to Enfield there were already two people died in A105 and one was an 8 year old kid. Totally avoidable deaths that nobody's 30 seconds worth it.

We should give this a good try and all of us ask ourselves what is the objective gain we are having from higher speeds where people live, shop and go out as opposed to the calmer proposal. 
Neil Littman posted a reply
14 Aug 2025 07:48
Yiannis, the fatal accident involving an eight-year old boy who was sadly killed in April 2023, was the result of a car reversing out of a parking space on Compton Road after the child ran into the road away from his parents. The inquest into the fatality has been delayed several times due to the ongoing police investigation but it is due to be reported next month at Barnet Coroners Court. There were eye witnesses and CCTV footage and the driver was not named.
Basil Clarke posted a reply
19 Aug 2025 19:00
Neil Littman wrote (message 7419) :

I have replied to the survey but just wanted to add a couple of comments here because I think the full picture of road accidents across the borough is more complex than the Summary of Evidence shows. I have no issue with 20mph in built up areas, near schools or many residential side streets and I live in one which was designated 20mph over ten years ago but it hasn't been any deterrent to speeding. I have had cars go past my home at up to 50mph and it's only been sheer luck no accidents have happened so far but looking at the stats over the past few years the two roads with the most accidents are the North Circular A406 and the A10 and at least half the pedestrian (am not counting car crashes which actually involve more fatalities than pedestrians overall in the UK) fatalities happened there. 

Neil, you're completely ignoring the absolutely and totally unarguable conclusion of the reports that I linked to: that new 20mph limits in various parts of London have reduced deaths and injuries sharply. The following quote is from the European Transport Safety Council :



A new study published by Transport for London (TfL) has shown that the introduction of 20mph speed limits and zones on local authority-managed roads in London between 1989 and 2013 led to significant reductions in collisions, injuries, and deaths, particularly among children and vulnerable road users.

The report, based on data from 157 individual 20mph schemes and a comparative analysis using a control group of all borough roads, provides strong evidence of the benefits of reducing speed limits in urban areas. The findings support the wider roll-out of lower speed limits as a core component of Vision Zero — London’s plan to eliminate road deaths and serious injuries by 2041.

Across all the schemes studied, the results were consistently positive:

    Total collisions fell by 35% (compared to 12% in the control group)
    All casualties fell by 36%
    Fatal or serious injuries fell by 34%
    Child casualties dropped by 46%, and children killed by 75%
    Among people walking, cycling, or riding motorcycles, killed or seriously injured (KSI) figures were reduced by 28%

Just the 34% reduction in fatal and serious injuries alone is a tremendous achievement (and such sharp reductions have not occurred on the non-20mph control roads, which shows that it's the lower speed limit that has done it).

Yes, there are still some people who drive at 50 in 20 or 30mph zones, and we need to stamp that out on the way to reducing deaths to zero, as has been achieved in Copenhagen. But the overall figure speaks for itself and nothing you say disproves it.

As for deaths and injuries on the A406 and A10, which, as you say is where most crashes occur (not "accidents" - the police no longer use that weasal wording), that just goes to prove the point that the higher the speed limit, the higher the toll in terms of deaths and injuries, especially on urban roads.
PGC Webmaster posted a reply
26 Aug 2025 15:04


The deadline for responding to the 20mph consultation has been brought forward by a fortnight and is now Sunday 7th September. The new date was advertised on the Journeys & Places website as follows:

Enfield Council are now looking to progress the first phase of Safer Street for Enfield: 20mph speed limits sooner than initially planned. This means that we will be undertaking the statutory consultation on the draft Traffic Order for Phase 1 from late September. In order for us to do this and consider the responses we have received from the current period of community engagement, we will now be closing the survey on Sunday 7 September 2025.

Thank you to everyone who has shared their comments via the survey or email to us since we launched this opportunity on 16 July. We look forward to hearing from more residents about their views on the proposed 20mph plan by Sunday 7 September.

PGC Webmaster posted a reply
10 Sep 2025 19:36
The deadline for responding to the consultation has been changed back to the original date: 21st September.
Neil Littman posted a reply
10 Oct 2025 13:09
Just to reply about your mention of the eight year old boy who was killed by a car in Compton Road in April 2023. The inquest finally took place this week and the police reported that it would be listed as an accidental death as the collision took place at 10mph when the boy ran into the path of the car and the driver only had 1.2 seconds to react. 
0

Find us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Follow us on Bluesky

Clicky