pgc all green working and signpost with lettering new colour 2
pgc all green working and signpost with lettering new colour 2
facebook icon twitter icon

Share this article share on facebook share on twitter

enfield dispatch front page january 2023
Why did seven Labour councillors ignore strongly expressed professional advice about risks to life and other serious deficiencies and vote against a motion to refuse planning permission for a new tower block in Brimsdown?

Some information that might provide a clue has been unearthed by the borough's independent community newspaper, Enfield Dispatch, and is revealed in the lead front-page story in its December issue, published yesterday.

Yet one more reason why I suggest that, even though the Dispatch is a free newspaper, people who value democracy and transparency should think about supporting it financially.

"Absence of a suitable fire strategy"

The vote in question occurred at a meeting of Enfield's planning committee in October last year, the second occasion on which the committee was considering an application to build a 21-storey block on the site of the former Station Tavern in Green Street. Despite unusually strong warnings from the council's planning officers that the proposal was deficient in no fewer than twelve respects - including, crucially, "the absence of a suitable fire strategy" and failure to "incorporate features which reduce the risk to life" - seven out of eight Labour councillors voted against the motion (the eighth Labour councillor, who did vote to refuse permission, was Doug Taylor, a former council leader and currently a councillor in Palmers Green ward).

"Monetary offer...could be 1 million pounds"

At the time Dispatch editor James Cracknell wrote a detailed report about the meeting, mentioning "audible gasps in the room when Labour committee member Mohammad Islam appeared to suggest he had been contacted by the applicant". Though any suggestion of inpropriety was subsequently ruled out at the meeting, James has since used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain a copy of a letter to the council sent shortly before the meeting in which planning agent Murat Aydemir dangles the prospect of a "monetary offer", which "could be 1 million pounds".

I don't know whether Labour councillors were aware of this letter or why they chose not to turn down the planning application, but what I am certain of is that we need a genuinely local press which is able to unearth this sort of information and then present it in an appropriately professional way. We are fortunate that Enfield residents do have this and should do everything to ensure its future.

enfield dispatch masthead

In issue 52 of Enfield Dispatch

  • The Dispatch reveals that Enfield Council was offered £1million to approve an ‘unsafe’ tower block in Brimsdown days before a planning committee meeting;
  • the promotion of a lease of Whitewebbs Park to Tottenham Hotspur sparks anger;
  • new Census 2021 data reveals how Enfield has changed;
  • a veteran sports journalist gives his verdict on Qatar 2022;
  • an Enfield primary school opens its own foodbank for parents;
  • find out why Fore Street is becoming the place to be;
  • how a new local art project is looking beyond the individual;
  • and meet the man who always knows Enfield Town FC’s opponents inside out.

Download in PDF format

Snow: Very pretty, but hazardous...

Also featured on the Dispatch's front page is a photograph of Clay Hill during the period when snow was on ground. As the caption says, "While many families went out to enjoy the snow, the week-long freeze led to severe problems on the roads, with many residential streets left ungritted and pavements dangerously covered in ice for several days."

Enfield was probably far from alone in not dealing adequately with the snow, and cuts in government funding to local government undoubtedly played a part. And how realistic is gritting residential side roads?  But the snow was forecast and surely some gritting on main roads on the afternoon and evening when it snowed could have kept the buses running that night and the following morning?

But by far the worst impact was felt by pedestrians. A slight thaw followed by days of subzero temperatures rendered pavements a deadly hazard for anyone for whom a fall could result in serious injury, especially when the ambulance service and accident and emergency services are on the brink of collapse following a decade of neglect. Many people without access to cars were effectively stranded at home for the best part of a week. How is this compatible with the new hierarchy set out in the last issue of the Highway Code, with pedestrians at the top, followed by horseriders and cyclists, and only then by car drivers?

Log in to comment
Clicky